0
잠시만 기다려 주세요. 로딩중입니다.

지식결과에 대한 타당성 검증

 Validation of Nursing-sensitive Patient Outcome

간호행정학회지 2000년 6권 3호 p.357 ~ 374
KMID : 0614820000060030357
염영희 (  ) - 한림대학교 간호학과

이규은 (  ) - 관동대학교 간호학과

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate knowledge outcomes included Nursing Outcomes Classification(NOC) developed by Johnson and Maas at the University of Iowa A sample of 71 nurse experts working in university affiliated hospitals participated in this study. They were asked to rate indicators that examplified the outcomes on a scale of 1(indicator is not at all characteristic) to 5(indicator is very characteristic). Aquestionnaire with an adaptation of Fehring´s methodology was used to establish the content validity of outcomes.
The results were as follows:
1. All indicators were considered to be ´supporting´ and no indicators were considered to be ´nonsupporting´.
2. `Knowledge: Treatment Regimen´ attained an OCV score of 0.816 and was the highest OCV score among outcomes.
3. ´Knowledge: Energy Conservation´ attained an OCV score of 0.748 and was the lowest OCV score among abuse: outcomes.
4. ´Knowledge: Breastfeeding´ attained an OCV score of 0.790 and was the highest indicator was `description of benefits of breastfeeding´.
5. ´Knowledge: Child Safety´ attained an OCV score of 0.778 and was the highest indicator was `demonstration of fvst aids techniques´.
6. `Knowledge: Diet´ attained an OCV score of 0.779 and was the highest indicator was `performance of self--monitoring activities´.
7. `Knowledge: Disease Process´ attained an OCV score of 0.81;1 and was the highest indicator was ´description of signs and symptoms´.
8. ´Knowledge: Health Behaviors´ attained an OCV score of 0.800 and was the highest indicator was ´description of safe use of prescription drugs´.
9. ´Knowledge: Health Resources´ attained an OCV score of 0.794 and was the highest indicator was ´description of need for follow-up care´.
10. ´Knowledge: Infection Control´ attained an OCV score of 0.793 and was the highest indicator was ´ciescxiption of signs and symptoms´.
11. ´Knowledge: Medication´ attained an OCV score of 0.789 and was the highest indicator was `description oaf correct administration of medication´.
12. `I~rrowledge: Personal Safety´ attained an OCV score of 0.804 and was the highest indicator was "description of measures to reduce risk of accidental injury .
13. ´Knowledge: Prescribed Activity´ attained an OCV ;score of 0.810 and was the highest indicator was `proper performance of exercise´.
14. `Knowledge: Substance Use Control´ attained an OCV score of 0.809 and was the highest indicator was ´description of signs of dependence during substance withdrawl´.
15. ´Knowledge: Treatment Procedure(s)´ attained an OCV score of 0.795 and was the highest indicator was `description of appropriate action for complications´.
16. `Knowledge: Treatment Regimen´ attained an OCV score of 0.816 and was the highest indicator was ´description of self-care responsibilities for emergency situations´.
More outcomes need to be validated and outcomes sensitive to Korean culture need to be developed.
KeyWords
간호결과분류, 타당성 검증, 표준화, 지식, Nursing Outciomes Classification, Knowledge
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
  
등재저널 정보
학술진흥재단(KCI) KoreaMed